Post a comment on a work item
POSThttps://
Creates one comment on the work item named in the path, authored as the authenticated user, and returns it in the detail view with a Location header pointing at the flat item path.
Access
- Token scope
- api:
write: project_management Without it:
403 insufficient-token-scope. - Permission
- project_management::
manage_work_items Without it:
403 insufficient-permission. - Rate cost
- 1 unit, write bucket. A write costs the same whatever
viewyou ask for. - Also
- Accepts
Idempotency-Key. Never cached:private, no-store. Unknown body keys are refused, never dropped.
Both are checked, scope first. A token never does more than its user. How access is checked
body is the only accepted key: the work item comes from the path, so commentable_type and commentable_id in the body are a 422, and the author is the caller, so author_type and author_id are never accepted. The body is rich text: mention spans read from an existing comment may be posted back verbatim and are preserved, but constructing a new mention is not supported in v2.0. Posting works exactly like posting in plnnrly, so mention notifications, thread events and the author's auto-subscription all fire. A deleted work item is 404.
Path parameters
Query parameters
Unknown parameters are refused with 400, naming the parameter.
Request headers
A correlation id of your own. It is recorded in our logs next to the server's request id but never returned: the response header always carries the server's id. A value that does not match the pattern is discarded silently, never rejected.
Request body
Unknown keys are refused with 422, naming the key.
Comment body as rich text. HTML from the plnnrly editor, sanitised on the way out, so what you read back can differ from the bytes you sent. Mention spans (<span data-type="mention" data-id="3">) survive untouched and may be posted back verbatim; constructing a new mention is not supported in v2.0.
Response 201
Returns a Comment in the detail view.
Headers
ETag- A strong validator of exactly this representation.
Idempotency-Replayedtruewhen this response was replayed from a storedIdempotency-Keyrather than produced by a new write.Location- The absolute URL of the created or queued resource.
RateLimit- The IETF
httpapi-ratelimit-headersform of your remaining allowance on the tightest bucket this request touched. RateLimit-Policy- The ceiling and window of that bucket, as
<limit>;w=<seconds>. X-Request-Id- The server-generated ULID correlating this response with our logs.
Every response also carries Cache-Control, Vary, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Plnnrly-Api-Version, X-RateLimit-Limit, X-RateLimit-Remaining, X-RateLimit-Reset. Headers and versioning
Comment body as rich text. HTML from the plnnrly editor, sanitised on the way out, so what you read back can differ from the bytes you sent. Mention spans (<span data-type="mention" data-id="3">) survive untouched and may be posted back verbatim; constructing a new mention is not supported in v2.0.
The kind of record commentable points at; it says which branch of commentable applies.
work_itemdrive_item
New values may be added.
The record the comment hangs off, as a reference. Look it up from commentable_type and commentable_id with GET /api/v2/work-items/{id} or GET /api/v2/drive-items/{id}. It is not expandable: ?include=commentable is a 400.
Which form you get depends on commentable_type.
work_itemRefdrive_itemRef
Last-write timestamp; use for incremental sync, and as the revision the strong ETag is derived from.
Errors
409 Conflict.
415 Unsupported media type.
422 Unprocessable content.
7 errors every operation can return: 400, 401, 404, 406, 429, 500, 503
400 Bad request.
idempotency-key-requiredinvalid-cursorinvalid-query-parametermalformed-requestunsupported-parameter
401 Unauthenticated.
404 Not found.
406 Not acceptable.
429 Too many requests.
500 Server error.
503 Service unavailable.
This path allows GET, POST. Anything else answers 405.
Something wrong or missing on this page? Tell us